Find the Right Application
The Carbon DLS process is ideal for a wide range of applications, from high-value athletic equipment that delivers performance and protection to rugged automotive components that meet stringent engineering requirements.
Looking for inspiration? Subscribe to “Ask an Additive Expert,” our video series featuring answers to common design and engineering questions presented by Carbon’s experts.
DLS Design Quick Guide
Carbon DLS lets you design the best parts for your product, without worrying about moldability or machinability. Like every 3D printing process, DLS has its own best practices; follow these principles to get the best results in your applications.
This design quick guide offers a multi-step workflow to help you design and evaluate parts quickly. Follow the steps below to determine whether your part is a good fit for the DLS process and identify aspects of your design that might need revision.
Table of Contents
- Evaluate: determine whether your project is well-suited to DLS printing.
- Design: consider the 3D printing process you’ll use as you design your part
- Optimize: improve print outcomes by refining your design.
Download the Carbon DLS™ Engineering Handbook
Begin by using these basic guidelines to determine whether your part is a good fit for Carbon DLS.
Will your part fit in Carbon’s 3D printers? For efficient production, consider how you’ll fit multiple parts in the build volume.
What mechanical characteristics do you require for your parts? What traditional thermoplastics would you usually specify?
|Resin||Ultimate tensile strength||Elongation at break||Tensile modulus||Shore hardness||Impact strength||Heat deflection temp||Comparable thermoplastic||Biocompatibility: cytotoxicity|
|2 Part Resins||CE 221||85 MPa||3%||3900 MPa||92D||15 J/m||230° C||Glass filled nylon||✓|
|EPU 40||9 MPa||300%||N/A||68A||N/A||N/A||TPU||✓|
|EPU 41||15 MPa||250%||N/A||73A||N/A||N/A||TPU||✓|
|EPX 82||80 MPa||5%||2800 MPa||89D||45 J/m||130° C||20% glass-filled PBT||✓|
|FPU 50||29 MPa||200%||700 MPa||71D||40 J/m||70° C||Polypropylene||✓|
|MPU 100||35 MPa||15%||1300 MPa||81D||30 J/m||50° C||–||✓|
|RPU 70||40 MPa||100%||1700 MPa||80D||15 J/m||60° C||ABS or PC ABS||✓|
|RPU 130||35 MPa||>50%||920 MPa||100D||76 J/m||119°C||Nylon 6||–|
|SIL 30||3.4 MPa||350%||N/A||35A||N/A||N/A||TPE||✓|
|1 Part Resins||DPR 10||45 MPa||4%||1800 MPa||N/A||20 J/m||61° C||–||✓|
|PR 25||29 MPa||>15%||920 MPa||N/A||18 J/m||49° C||–||✓|
|UMA 90||30 MPa||30%||1400 MPa||86D||30 J/m||45° C||–||✓|
Does your part need to perform well when used with any of these common chemicals?
|Class||Chemical||CE 221||EPU 40||EPU 41||EPX 82||RPU 70||RPU 130||SIL 30|
|Household Chemicals||Bleach (NaClO, 5%)||E||E||E||E||E||–||E|
|Sanitizer (NH4Cl, 10%)||E||E||E||E||E||–||G|
|Sunscreen (Banana Boat, SPF 50)||E||G||P||E||E||G||G|
|Detergent (Tide, Original)||E||E||G||E||E||–||G|
|Windex Powerized Formula||E||G||G||E||E||–||G|
|Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2, 30%)||E||F||F||E||E||–||F|
|Ethanol (EtOH, 95%)||E||P||P||G||F||–||P|
|Industrial Fluids||Engine Oil (Havoline SAE 5W-30)||E||E||E||E||E||E||E|
|Brake Fluid (Castrol DOT-4)||E||F||F||E||E||–||P|
|Airplane Deicing Fluid (Type I Ethylene Glycol)||E||E||–||–||E||–||E|
|Airplane Deicing Fluid (Type I Propylene Glycol)||E||E||–||–||E||–||G|
|Airplane Deicing Fluid (Type IV Ethylene Glycol)||E||E||–||–||E||–||E|
|Airplane Deicing Fluid (Type IV Propylene Glycol)||E||E||–||–||E||–||G|
|Transmission Fluid (Havoline Synthetic ATF)||E||E||E||E||E||E||E|
|Engine Coolant (Havoline XLC, 50%/50% Premixed)||E||E||–||E||E||–||E|
|Diesel (Chevron #2)||E||P||P||E||E||E||F|
|Gasoline (Chevron #91)||E||P||–||–||P||–||P|
|Strong Acid/Base||Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4, 30%)||E||P||F||E||E||–||P|
|Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH, 10%)||E||E||–||E||E||–||E|
|Note: Due to variability in part geometry and level of exposure in actual use, it is required that adequate validation is done for production applications.|
|E||Excellent||< 5%||The solvent is unlikely to degrade the material during prolonged exposure|
|G||Good||5% – 15%||The solvent is unlikely to degrade the material during short-term exposure|
|F||Fair||15% – 30%||The solvent will likely degrade the material during short-term exposure|
|P||Poor||> 30%||The solvent will likely attack and aggressively degrade the material when exposed|
|* Percentages are percent weight lost after a 1 week submersion per ASTM D543. This is only a value of weight lost and not representative of changes in dimension or mechanical properties.|
Once you have determined that your part is a good fit for the Carbon DLS process, the next step is to review your part’s features. Refer to the recommended feature sizes below to ensure your part’s printability.
Overhangs, unsupported angles, and unsupported wall thickness will inform the print orientation and support strategy for your part.
Recommended feature sizes
Are your features properly sized for successful printing?
|FEATURE||RPU 70||RPU 130||MPU 100||FPU 50||CE 221||EPX 82||PR 25||UMA 90||EPU 40||EPU 41||SIL 30|
|Wall Thickness – Unsupported (mm)||2.5||2.5||2.5||2.5||2.5||2.5||2.5||2.5||2.5||2.5||2.5|
|Wall Thickness – Supported (mm)||1.0||1.5||1.0||1.0||1.0||1.5||1.0||1.0||1.0||1.0||1.5|
|Maximum Overhang (mm) – M1/M2||2.0||2.0||3.0||2.0||3.0||2.0||3.0||3.0||1.0||1.0||1.0|
|Maximum Overhang (mm) – L1||2.0||2.0||3.0||2.0||3.0||2.0||3.0||3.0||1.5||1.5||1.5|
|Maximum Bridge (2x overhang) (mm)||4.0||4.0||6.0||4.0||6.0||4.0||6.0||6.0||2.0||2.0||2.0|
|Unsupported Angle from Horizontal (deg)||30||40||40||35||40||40||30||30||40||40||40|
|Hole Size XY (mm)||0.5||0.5||0.9||0.5||1.0||0.6||0.9||0.9||1.0||1.5||2.0|
|Hole Size Z (mm)||0.6||0.5||0.8||0.5||0.7||0.9||0.6||0.8||0.8||1.0||2.0|
|Positive Feature Size XY (mm)||0.4||0.3||0.4||0.5||0.4||0.3||0.6||0.4||0.5||0.75||1.0|
|Positive Feature Size Z (mm)||0.2||0.3||0.2||0.2||0.2||0.2||0.2||0.2||0.2||0.3||1.0|
|Engraving Depth / Embossing Height (mm)||0.3||0.3||0.3||0.3||0.4||0.3||0.3||0.3||0.3||0.3||0.5|
|Text Size, Engraved / Embossed (mm)||3.0||3.0||3.0||3.0||3.0||3.0||3.0||3.0||3.0||3.0||3.5|
|Clearance Between Mating Parts (mm)||0.4||0.5||0.5||0.5||0.8||0.4||0.5||0.5||0.5||0.5||0.5|
To compensate for overcure, horizontal holes should be oversized ~0.04 mm.
Measured relative to the platform (XY). Unsupported angles over 40 degrees are safe for all materials.
Bridges should span no more than twice the recommended overhang distance.
Interior corners: ~0.5 mm minimum
Exterior corners: ~0.5 mm + wall thickness
Print mating parts in the same orientation.
Walls at minimum thickness should be kept short.
Refine your design using these guidelines to ensure dimensional accuracy, excellent surface quality, and overall performance that meets your requirements.
Issues to address before adding supports
Consider these recommendations as you design your part.
Low resolution model
Adjust export settings in your CAD software to make a smooth model.
Add fillets or chamfers
Unvented volumes and blind holes
Add 2-3 mm vents or re-orient part.
Islands must be supported or connected to part in order to prevent print defects.
Non-uniform, rapidly changing or stepped wall thickness
Make wall thickness uniform, or keep changes in thickness as gradual as possible in order to minimize print defects and prevent warping during baking.
Tall, thin parts
Change orientation, or redesign to reduce part height and/or create stability.
Use Carbon’s print preparation software to add supports to your part design.
- Check overhangs and unsupported angles using the Overhang Detection feature
- Place supports no closer than the recommended overhang distances from part walls and other supports
- Ensure that slice islands are supported
- Use the Advanced Supports feature to ensure first-print success
- Reinforce supports that are longer than 76 mm. Fences can use bar supports as reinforcement.
The accuracy of every 3D printing process depends on several factors, including material characteristics, part geometry, operator practices, and post-processing techniques. The Carbon DLS process offers excellent accuracy and repeatability, within tolerances as tight as +/-40 μm, but this depends on the factors listed above and may require some optimization to achieve consistent results in serial production. To learn more about DLS accuracy, check out our general and production repeatability accuracy guidelines for engineering materials.